Wednesday, October 27, 2010
Perspective
For the perspective project, I decided to with space and the word "Illumination". I blended the symbolism in the top left corner with the clasped hands and Pieta representing the major focuses of Catholicism . While nature is present in the form of incoming light, the pile of rocks/columns represent material. The perspective of the image is stretched inwards, with the space being distorted to one
Sunday, October 24, 2010
Point: Alternatives
Unlike the secular concerns of the Roman Empire, a spiritual focus came to govern design throughout the Gothic Age. Heavenly oriented architecture that categorized the existence of Man in respect to God became the standard, sparking the construction of Cathedrals throughout Europe. These buildings, which employed the use of light to illuminate it's interiors (ie. Amiens, Cologne Cathedral), helped perpetuate the atmosphere of divinity, bringing closure to the many who struggled to find spiritual enlightenment. Although historically short lived, the period provided the necessary tools to break from the traditional plane of thought.
The revival and reinterpretation of the classical aspects of design belonging to the Greeks and Romans came to light with the passing of the Renaissance. Returning to a human oriented focus, architecture served to celebrate the intellectual and creative facets of Man. Within the confines of the classical balancing of elements, buildings were constructed with clearly present boundaries, maintaining a harmonious unity equivalent to the rationalizations of the respective design period. The façade of Santa Maria Novella clearly demonstrates this transitional period of reinterpretation; although without function, the borrowing of columns and elements of design from the classics gives the facade a visually stimulating appearance, pinpointing it's details on the front. Also, because the Renaissance paralleled a period of prosperity and wealth, various classes were capable of constructing their own images of classical representation, bringing about various designs that expanded the movement as a whole.
Although it's appropriate to accept the limitations of finite surfaces concerning the portrayal of infinite measures, the realm of movement through the manipulation of design was evidently articulated by the following Baroque period, creating within it a medium for which the embodiment of social performance became possible. As such, because the period placed emphasis on the effect of movement rather than the effect of symmetry and balance, as demonstrated with the passing of the Renaissance, a representational depiction that suggested the existence of the unseen came to find solace within the distortions and deliberate bending of space. Mirroring nature, baroque thinkers expressed ordered worlds consistently threatened by unknown forces, environments existing in essential but fragile harmony. Like the curving staircases throughout the period that deviated from the linear form, the symbolic representation of movement broke from the traditional notion of function over style, with the illusion of motion being both figurative and dramatic.
Sunday, October 17, 2010
Reading Comp #4
Concerning the list of artifacts (desk/bookcase with chinoiserie, windsor chair, tall clock, state bed, and sheraton side chair), similar elements of line, proportion, and unity are found throughout the various pieces. Although the styles of design vary from having “gilded flowers, trees, and/or people against a black background” (Roth 451) to “[having] architectural details such as columns or broken pediments for displaying sculpture or porcelain” (Roth 428), the presence of straight lines and curved counterparts, and how they complement each other, is a characteristic all five pieces have in common.
Repetition is heavily present throughout the list of given spaces (Holkham Hall saloon, Gunston hall stair hall, Marie Antoinette's bedroom, Saltram House saloon, and Gardner-Pingree House parlor). While “symmetry continues to define wall paneling” (Roth 464), typical patterns found throughout the given spaces include surfaces that resemble textiles, framed paintings, and/or naturalistic designs. While the repetition of geometric shapes and compartments are clearly present throughout the spaces, the patterns are often separated by color or contrast provided by the varying depths of light.
The use of vertical lines and emphasis tie the list of buildings together (Chiswick House, Drayton Hall, Pantheon, Nathaniel Russel House, and Monticello). Columns are found throughout the various designs, each placing emphasis on the symmetrical facade of their respective building. All five of the buildings balance the use of horizontal and vertical lines (found in the symmetrical distancing of windows, levels, etc.) to create a harmonious architectural entity.
Each of the places listed (London Williamsburg, Paris, New Town, Scotland, and Washington) reinterpreted and revived various aspects of classicism throughout their architecture and city-planning, the styles becoming visual metaphors for culture and progress. The similar elements of form and line are embodied by the cities' intersecting lines and focal points (i.e. roads, communal centers, etc.).
Common design ancestry across the Atlantic Ocean concerning England during the Neo-Palladian and Late Georgian periods is evidenced by the inherent design similarities found throughout furniture, interior, building, and planning designs in the New World. “Colonial furniture closely follows English models [with the] earliest examples [following] Elizabethan and Jacobean forms and details” (Roth 264). With respect to exterior and interior architecture, the overhanging upper stories of many colonial houses were influenced by the New England jetty. Similarities found throughout interiors largely stemmed from the inherent drive to follow vernacular medieval traditions and importation of English furniture, with “colonists [traveling] to England [to] bring back fashionable items” (Roth 258). Because homes were largely influenced by their English counterparts, the positioning of buildings in respect to each other were similar. Colonial cities often focused around town centers and churches, with roads intersecting and dividing cities into individual sections that would come together to form a harmonious unit.
Concerning France and it's design influences, “architecture, interiors, and furnishings in New France closely resembles those in France and derive from the settlers' classes and regions of origin, some being more vernacular and others being more high-style” (Roth 289). Because collective French heritages appeared in different areas, forms and construction techniques were slightly altered to accommodate for the difference in local climate and needs, causing distinctive regional characteristics. While vernacular buildings were preferred along the Mississippi River and in Louisiana, New Orleans displayed a sophisticated model of French architecture. However, commonly reflected throughout these domestic architectural designs were verticality, evidence of structure, and function over style. As such, steep roofs, half-timber construction, and square shapes were common throughout French colonial architecture. Regarding furniture, simpler forms of the Louis XIII, Louis XIV, and Louis XV styles were popular in most French settlements.
[3] From the Hersey/Freedman reading, DESIGN and POST a labeled floor plan of a possible Palladian villa inspired by Girolamo Frescobaldi’s Balletto Terzo
Although it's appropriate to accept the limitations of finite surfaces concerning the portrayal of infinite measures, the realm of movement through the manipulation of design was evidently articulated by the Baroque period, creating within it a medium for which the embodiment of social performance became possible. As such, because the period placed emphasis on the effect of movement rather than the effect of symmetry and balance, a representational depiction that suggested the existence of the unseen came to find solace within the distortions and deliberate bending of space. Stemming from Shakespeare's philosophy of art mirroring nature, baroque thinkers expressed ordered worlds consistently threatened by unknown forces, environments existing in essential but fragile harmony.
In class, we detailed the flowing characteristics of Baroque architecture, spearheading staircases as one of the clearest examples of the style. Curving rather than linear, the symbolic representation of movement breaks from the traditional notion of function over style, deviating from what became a widely acknowledged form of stagnation. Practicality aside, to which there was no tangible improvement, this distortion of shape reinforced the theatricality of the period, that the illusion of motion was both figurative and dramatic.
Sunday, October 3, 2010
Point: Foundations
Expanding on this concept of order and its subjective form of appropriateness, we'll examine the two cultures discussed heavily in class. Concerning architectural layouts, the Greeks associated harmony with asymmetric forms- beauty derived from imperfection was considered plausible. For example, the buildings located throughout the Athenian Acropolis (the Parthenon, Erechtheum, Propylaea, Temple of Athena Nike, Eleusinion, etc.) were asymmetrically oriented in context to each other, partially because the Greeks preferred to build with the landscape. However, there was a practical reasoning to this style of planning: the Parthenon, being the focus site, had to be shown in a 3/4ths perspective relative to the entrance of Acropolis to garner the proper emotions from its visitors. This idea of asymmetrical beauty was further explored in the overall design of the Parthenon. Because of the building's 3/4ths perspective, the columns, which commanded visual attention to its form, were spaced out unevenly in the far corners to surpress the illusion of compression stemmed from an evenly spaced out design.
The Romans, unlike their Greek predecessors, preferred a symmetrical style of planning that focused on horizontal expansion and dominance over nature. Starting with a series of perpendicular roads, or cross roads, as a foundation, Romans set out to build cities in an organized manner. Instead of building with the intent of complementing nature, Romans shaped their surrounding landscape to accomodate their architectural endeavors. This is reflected in the similarities found throughout the many Roman cities located in the former empire. Reinforcing upon the notion of order, unlike the Greeks, who designed open temples, Romans constructed temples with a defined entrance, ensuring that people entered these buildings in a predictable, planned manner.
Another topic that was touched upon concerned the Roman use of arches. The concept of the arch, which hadn't been introduced before, was a technological achievement that altered the way buildings were designed and made. Capable of spreading out heavy loads and relieving the stress felt by topping elements, arches allowed for highly expanded, open buildings. Structures ranging from bathhouses to aqueducts became an inherent possibility, their presence widely felt throughout the Roman Empire. The arch, which later became the foundation for ribbed vaults, overlapping arches, and domes, was a technological discovery that had profound effects on the architectural styles and preferences of the Roman people.
Reaching into the Gothic era of architecture, we covered various cathedrals and explored the meanings and origins behind their designs. Many cathedrals, like the Cologne cathedral in Germany, were designed with flying buttresses and ribbed vaults, an element found lacking in earlier buildings. Because of their applied use, cathedrals were capable of constructing tall buildings that rarely relied on the presence of thick, stone walls for support. Instead, thin, skeletal-like walls were used, reserving an ample amount of space for large, tinted windows. This allowed light to play a heavily influencing factor in the designs of cathedrals, ultimately affecting the way people recognized religion and their respective faiths.
The information found throughout the unit is elusively applied in modern times. Although some aspects of the unit are universal and inherent in all societies (i.e., concept of order), the technological advancements discussed are still widely used throughout the world. It is without reason to assume the complete independency of modern architecture- without these historical cultures, many methods of architecture would be nonexistent. As with all interacting cultures, the persistence of time will inevitably draw aspects from various cultures to create out of them a foundation for the future.